On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 12:12:22 -0700
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Eric wrote:
> > Actually except when we can't find the process we were just at
> > the current code doesn't miss any newly added processes.
>
> Random thought -- could we have file descriptors open on /proc put some
> sort of 'hold' on whatever /proc entry they were just at, so it doesn't
> disappear out from under them, even if that process has otherwise fully
> exited?
>
Sorry for long absense, I was on vacation.
I and my colleague are still working on ps command fix.
For holding, I have a patch to insert a token in a list to remember its
position. but my colleague may have another thought.
-Kame
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
