Eric wrote:
> Actually except when we can't find the process we were just at
> the current code doesn't miss any newly added processes.
Random thought -- could we have file descriptors open on /proc put some
sort of 'hold' on whatever /proc entry they were just at, so it doesn't
disappear out from under them, even if that process has otherwise fully
exited?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- References:
- [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [RFC] ps command race fix
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc4-mm1
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] ps command race fix
- Index(es):
 |