On Monday 14 August 2006 14:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> And this too - the value now in %eax has no relation with the
> >> value known by the caller of this routine (which doesn't expect
> >> any return from here anyway).
> >
> >Ok, but somehow it needs to be annotiated so that the unwinder stops
> >and doesn't fall back. Can you please send a replacement patch that
> >does this correctly?
>
> Actually, with the previous attempt we still didn't achieve the
> original
> goal of terminating the frame chain at kernel_thread_helper. Thus
> another try (the seemingly odd extra push can be avoided once we
> start using CFI expressions, which the unwinder currently doesn't
> support):
I added the extra push thanks (hope there weren't more changes)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
