Re: [PATCH for review] [130/145] i386: clean up topology.c

["Magnus Damm" <magnus.damm@gmail.com>]

On 8/11/06, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 21:37 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >  static int __init topology_init(void)
> >  {
> >         int i;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> >         for_each_online_node(i)
> >                 register_one_node(i);
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> >
> >         for_each_present_cpu(i)
> >                 arch_register_cpu(i);
> >         return 0;
> >  }
>
> Wouldn't it be more proper here to make register_one_node() have a
> non-NUMA definition, instead of putting an #ifdef in a .c file like
> this?

I thought about that too, and my reason for not doing it is that this
simple fix would be less straight-forward and probably more subject to
whining and arguing. So my plan was to do this as a first step and
then encourage anyone else that wanted to fix up register_one_node()
properly. =)

Cheers,

/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/