Re: [PATCH for review] [130/145] i386: clean up topology.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday 10 August 2006 21:50, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 21:37 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >  static int __init topology_init(void)
> >  {
> >         int i;
> >  
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> >         for_each_online_node(i)
> >                 register_one_node(i);
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
> >  
> >         for_each_present_cpu(i)
> >                 arch_register_cpu(i);
> >         return 0;
> >  } 
> 
> Wouldn't it be more proper here to make register_one_node() have a
> non-NUMA definition, instead of putting an #ifdef in a .c file like
> this?

I don't see a particular advantage of that for something simple like this. 
But if you feel strongly about it please submit a tested replacement patch.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux