Re: [patch] i386: annotate the rest of entry.s::nmi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> >Part of the NMI handler is missing annotations.  Just moving
>> >the RING0_INT_FRAME macro fixes it.  And additional comments
>> >should warn anyone changing this to recheck the annotations.
>> 
>> I have to admit that I can't see the value of this movement; the
>> code sequence in question was left un-annotated intentionally.
>> The point is that the push-es in FIX_STACK() aren't annotated, so
>> things won't be correct at those points anyway.
>
>I have a patch here that adds that, but it won't compile
>because that part of the NMI handler is un-annotated:

But you didn't clarify why you need this piece of code annotated...

Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux