Hi,
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 12:15 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 18:12 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
[snip]
> > did you look whether gfs2 in -mm needs something similar?
>
> It doesn't appear to. It doesn't manipulate i_nlink in the same, direct
> manner.
>
> -- Dave
I think it will need something similar. I suspect the required changes
will all be confined to routines in inode.c. If the link count is
changed by (a) remote node(s), then gfs2_inode_attr_in() might change
the link count. Also gfs2_change_nlink() is the other place to look. I
think everywhere else is ok,
Steve.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
