Re: modifying degraded raid 1 then re-adding other members is bad

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday August 9, [email protected] wrote:
> >> Why we're updating it BACKWARD in the first place?
> >
> >To avoid writing to spares when it isn't needed - some people want
> >their spare drives to go to sleep.
> 
> That sounds a little dangerous. What if it decrements below 0?

It cannot.
md  decrements the event count only on a dirty->clean transition, and
only if it had previously incremented the count on a clean->dirty
transition.  So it can never go below what it was when the array was
assembled.

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux