On Tuesday 08 August 2006 16:03, Paolo Giarrusso wrote:
> Andi Kleen <[email protected]> ha scritto:
>
> > Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > We have never used this flag and recently one user experienced a
> > complaining
> > > warning about this (there was a symbol in the positive half of
> > the address space
> > > IIRC). So fix it.
> >
> > You can't use kernel cmodel in user space. It requires running on
> > negative
> > virtual addresses. I would be surprised if it worked for you.
>
> Argh, yes, I didn't test the patch and I didn't think to it a lot. So
> what about the following bug? Should we hack our own module loader
> based on x86-64's one?
Add the positive relocations to the standard x86-64 loader
and send me a patch. Then you can reuse it.
That should be cleaner than forking it
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
