Andi Kleen <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <[email protected]>
> >
> > We have never used this flag and recently one user experienced a
> complaining
> > warning about this (there was a symbol in the positive half of
> the address space
> > IIRC). So fix it.
>
> You can't use kernel cmodel in user space. It requires running on
> negative
> virtual addresses. I would be surprised if it worked for you.
Argh, yes, I didn't test the patch and I didn't think to it a lot. So
what about the following bug? Should we hack our own module loader
based on x86-64's one?
Moreover, who has recently tested module loading in x86-64 uml
kernels? I don't remember doing such testing recently...
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=user-mode-linux-devel&m=115125101012707&w=2
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale!
http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
