Re: Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16

[Manuel Reimer <Manuel.Spam@nurfuerspam.de>]

Nathan Scott schrieb:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:34:48AM +0200, Manuel Reimer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > could someone please tell me if XFS is trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16? 
> > There have been some bugs:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6380
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6757
>
> These are the same problem.  2.6.16 is unaffected.

But the bug has been filed for 2.6.16.4.

Did you want to say, that the latest 2.6.16 is unaffected?

> > want a stable kernel and 2.6.16 seems to fit all my needs.
>
> For XFS, its goodness.  2.6.18 will be good too, and 2.6.17.7+.

What exactly did you want to tell with this sentence. Sorry, but my 
native language is german...

Is it a good solution to stay on the 2.6.16 branch? Of course I could 
use 2.6.17 or 2.6.18 but I want to update the kernel as infrequent as 
possible. After 2.6.18 there will be 2.6.19 and 2.6.20. If I continue 
that way, then I'll have more downtime than uptime.

Thank you very much in advance

Yours

Manuel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/