Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16

Hello,

could someone please tell me if XFS is trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16? There have been some bugs:

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6380
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6757

and maybe there are more of them. I would like to stay on the 2.6.16 branch as I don't like to update my kernel several times a week. I just want a stable kernel and 2.6.16 seems to fit all my needs.

Thank you very much in advance

Yours

Manuel Reimer

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16
    • From: Nathan Scott <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.18-rc3-mm2: bad e1000 device name
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] ELF Relocatable x86 and x86_64 bzImages
• Previous by thread: [RFC] NUMA futex hashing
• Next by thread: Re: Is XFS trustworthy in the latest 2.6.16
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]