Re: [PATCH 004 of 9] md: Factor out part of raid10d into a separate function.

don't think this is better, NeilBrown wrote:

raid10d has toooo many nested block, so take the fix_read_error
functionality out into a separate function.

Definite improvement in readability. Will all versions of the compiler do something appropriate WRT inlining or not?

--
bill davidsen <[email protected]>
 CTO TMR Associates, Inc
 Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 004 of 9] md: Factor out part of raid10d into a separate function.
    • From: Neil Brown <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 000 of 9] md: Introduction - assorted cleanup and minor fixes
    • From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 004 of 9] md: Factor out part of raid10d into a separate function.
    • From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 005 of 9] md: Replace magic numbers in sb_dirty with well defined bit flags
• Next by Date: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
• Previous by thread: [PATCH 004 of 9] md: Factor out part of raid10d into a separate function.
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 004 of 9] md: Factor out part of raid10d into a separate function.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]