>> >I didn't mean to say your particular drive were crap, but 200GB SATA >> >drives are low end, like it or not -- >> >> And you think an 18 GB SCSI disk just does it better because it's SCSI? > >18 GB SCSI disks are 1999 gear, so who cares? >Seagate didn't sell 200 GB SATA drives at that time. > >> Esp. in long sequential reads. > >You think SCSI drives aren't on par? Right, they're ahead. >98 MB/s for the fastest SCSI drives vs. 88 MB/s for Raptor 150 GB SATA >and 74 MB/s for the fastest other ATA drives. Uhuh. And how do they measure that? Did they actually ran sth like... dd_rescue /dev/hda /dev/null Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Nate Diller" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Nate Diller" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Nate Diller" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Adrian Ulrich <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- Prev by Date: Re: [take2 1/4] kevent: core files.
- Next by Date: [PATCH -rt] clean up pi_lock in rtmutex
- Previous by thread: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- Next by thread: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- Index(es):
 |