> suspect, particularly with 7200/min (s)ATA crap. Quoting myself (again): >> A quick'n'dirty ZFS-vs-UFS-vs-Reiser3-vs-Reiser4-vs-Ext3 'benchmark' Yeah, the test ran on a single SATA-Harddisk (quick'n'dirty). I'm so sorry but i don't have access to a $$$ Raid-System at home. Anyway: The test shows us that Reiser4 performed very good on my (common 0-8-15) hardware. > sdparm --clear=WCE /dev/sda # please. How about using /dev/emcpower* for the next benchmark? I mighty be able to re-run it in a few weeks if people are interested and if i receive constructive suggestions (= Postmark parameters, mkfs options, etc..) Regards, Adrian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Adrian Ulrich <[email protected]>
- Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Horst H. von Brand" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Adrian Ulrich <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Nate Diller" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Nate Diller" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: David Lang <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: "Nate Diller" <[email protected]>
- Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- From: Matthias Andree <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: usb related oops after resume
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC 1/4] kevent: core files.
- Previous by thread: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- Next by thread: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- Index(es):
 |