Al Boldi wrote:
Being semantically the same, while not exhibiting ramfs pitfalls, makes it suitable to be pushed into the -stable tree, IMHO.This is total nonsense.Are you sure?
Yes.
They're very different from an implementation standpoint.Think ext2/3.
Not applicable to this case. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
- Prev by Date: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by Date: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
- Previous by thread: Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
- Next by thread: Re: [stable] [PATCH] initramfs: Allow rootfs to use tmpfs instead of ramfs
- Index(es):
 |