* Al Boldi ([email protected]) wrote:
> Being semantically the same, while not exhibiting ramfs pitfalls, makes it
> suitable to be pushed into the -stable tree, IMHO.
You are failing to show how this is a critical type bugfix for -stable.
We are picky about -stable additions because we don't want to undermine
the value of the -stable tree.
thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]