On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 20:48:23 +0200
"Jesper Juhl" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Perhaps I am misreading this patch set?
> >
> i don't think you are. It's just that I want to take the least
> intrusive route *now*, make us -Wshadow clean, get -Wshadow to be an
> accepted part of the Makefile, *then* deal with the more
> intrusive/controversial renamings, where I guess you'd have done
> things in the opposite order - right?
yup. Experience tells us that it's better to get things right first time,
because we don't get around to doing the intended second pass (looks at
lock_cpu_hotplug())
That being said, no, we can't go and rename up(). Let us go through the
patches one-at-a-time..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
