[PATCH] 9p: fix fid behavior on failed remove

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>From 188a447b579a96ef485ee6911f0e6f7d520f896a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:13:49 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] 9p: fix fid behavior on failed remove

Fix fid behavior on failed remove.

Based on a bug report from Russ Ross <[email protected]>

According to the spec:

"The remove request asks the file server both to remove the file
 represented by fid and to clunk the fid, even if the remove fails."

but the Linux client seems to expect the fid to be valid after a
failed remove attempt.  Specifically, I'm getting this behavior when
attempting to remove a non-empty directory.

Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen <[email protected]>
---
 fs/9p/vfs_inode.c |    8 ++++----
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
index 61ce38d..91a0ea5 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
@@ -433,10 +433,10 @@ static int v9fs_remove(struct inode *dir
 	result = v9fs_t_remove(v9ses, fid, &fcall);
 	if (result < 0) {
 		PRINT_FCALL_ERROR("remove fails", fcall);
-	} else {
-		v9fs_put_idpool(fid, &v9ses->fidpool);
-		v9fs_fid_destroy(v9fid);
-	}
+	} 
+
+	v9fs_put_idpool(fid, &v9ses->fidpool);
+	v9fs_fid_destroy(v9fid);
 
 	kfree(fcall);
 	return result;
-- 
1.4.2.rc1.g83e1

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux