On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:09:19PM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> > A serious suggestion is, providing that the arguments presented (people
> > busy with OLS preparations and long review queue for 2.6.17.N+1):
> >
> > How about doing 2.6.17.7 as an interim release fixing just what is known
> > to be critical at the point of the release, and then review the rest for
> > 2.6.17.8? That would nicely fit the release early, release often - users
> > like that particularly for bug fixes.
>
> OK, 2.6.17.7 is out, but still - is this suggestion worthwhile
> considering for future -stable release engineering or just crap?
.7 took a bit longer than expected, due to some security bugs that
needed to be added to the queue, combined with the fact that both Chris
and I were busy with OLS stuff. Normally we both aren't travelling at
the same time, but right then, we were, so we couldn't respond as
quickly as it seems some people felt we should have.
Sorry about this, we'll try to do better next time.
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
