On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Matthias Andree wrote:
> A serious suggestion is, providing that the arguments presented (people
> busy with OLS preparations and long review queue for 2.6.17.N+1):
>
> How about doing 2.6.17.7 as an interim release fixing just what is known
> to be critical at the point of the release, and then review the rest for
> 2.6.17.8? That would nicely fit the release early, release often - users
> like that particularly for bug fixes.
OK, 2.6.17.7 is out, but still - is this suggestion worthwhile
considering for future -stable release engineering or just crap?
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
