Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2

On 7/27/06, H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]> wrote:

No need to add sys_revoke.


Of course not.  I didn't imply that.  sys_revokeat is all that's
needed.  I just provided the other name to make clear they are
equivalent wrt to the file name property.  Not everyone knows the *at
functions.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: "Ulrich Drepper" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: "Ulrich Drepper" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: O_CAREFUL flag to disable open() side effects
Next by Date: Re: O_CAREFUL flag to disable open() side effects
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]