Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Pekka J Enberg" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
From: "Ulrich Drepper" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 10:13:13 -0700
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]

On 7/27/06, Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]> wrote:

Sure. Though I wonder if sys_frevoke is enough for us and we can drop
sys_revoke completely.


No, you want sys_revoke/sys_revokeat.  Simplest case: /dev/rst0 vs
/dev/nrst0.  You don't want the open rewind the drive.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: "Ulrich Drepper" <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
  - From: Pekka J Enberg <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] documentation: Documentation/initrd.txt
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] kthread: drivers/base/firmware_class.c
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
Next by thread: Re: [RFC/PATCH] revoke/frevoke system calls V2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux