Martin wrote:
> +static inline int percpu_populate_mask(void *__pdata, size_t size, gfp_t gfp,
> + int cpu)
> +{
It seems odd to me that this signature of percpu_populate_mask()
has its last argument 'int cpu' for the !CONFIG_SMP case, but
the SMP signatures have 'cpumask_t mask'.
Shouldn't this function signature be the same for all CONFIG's?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
