On Wednesday 26 July 2006 18:10, Josef Sipek wrote:
> You should use (hid) instead of hid. Because of how the pre-processor works.
>
Or, even better, use an inline function instead of a macro whereever
possible.
One more thing, the description for patch 1 can probably be refined
a bit more and put into Documentation/somewhere as a new file.
Regarding the split of the patch, it's usually a bad idea to
put the header file into a separate patch from its users.
E.g. if someone during debugging tries to revert patch 2 but not
patch 1, he ends up with a broken build.
Arnd <><
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
