[PATCH] [fs] Add lock annotation to grab_super

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



grab_super gets called with sb_lock held, and releases it.  Add a lock
annotation to this function so that sparse can check callers for lock pairing,
and so that sparse will not complain about this function since it
intentionally uses the lock in this manner.

Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
---
 fs/super.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 6d4e817..97a521c 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(deactivate_super);
  *	success, 0 if we had failed (superblock contents was already dead or
  *	dying when grab_super() had been called).
  */
-static int grab_super(struct super_block *s)
+static int grab_super(struct super_block *s) __releases(sb_lock)
 {
 	s->s_count++;
 	spin_unlock(&sb_lock);


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux