Re: [patch] Reorganize the cpufreq cpu hotplug locking to not be totally bizare

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>]

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Dave Jones wrote:
> 
> Looks sensible to me.   Assuming it passes testing..

It looked sensible to me too, although it still shows some "Lukewarm IQ" 
notices for the ondemand driver:

	Lukewarm IQ detected in hotplug locking
	BUG: warning at kernel/cpu.c:38/lock_cpu_hotplug()
	 [<c0103d07>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
	 [<c01042ec>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
	 [<c013778d>] lock_cpu_hotplug+0x43/0x69
	 [<c012f9df>] __create_workqueue+0x52/0x11f
	 [<df0ec34b>] cpufreq_governor_dbs+0x9f/0x2bd [cpufreq_ondemand]
	 [<c0305542>] __cpufreq_governor+0x57/0xd8
	 [<c0305700>] __cpufreq_set_policy+0x13d/0x1a9
	 [<c0305906>] store_scaling_governor+0x12d/0x155
	 [<c0304fbd>] store+0x34/0x45
	 [<c01998fc>] sysfs_write_file+0x99/0xbf
	 [<c0164953>] vfs_write+0xab/0x157
	 [<c0164f8c>] sys_write+0x3b/0x60
	 [<c0102d41>] sysenter_past_esp+0x56/0x79

but is sure looks better than it used to. Which is why I already applied 
it ;)

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/