Re: [PATCH] mm: inactive-clean list

["Martin Schwidefsky" <schwidefsky@googlemail.com>]

On 7/26/06, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > Hmm, I wonder how the inactive clean list helps in regard to the fast
> > host reclaim
> > scheme. In particular since the memory pressure that triggers the
> > reclaim is in the
> > host, not in the guest. So all pages might be on the active list but
> > the host still
> > wants to be able to discard pages.
> >
>
> I think Rik would want to set all the already unmapped pages to volatile
> state in the hypervisor.
>
> These pages can be dropped without loss of information on the guest
> system since they are all already on a backing-store, be it regular
> files or swap.

I guessed that as well. It isn't good enough. Consider a guest with a
large (virtual) memory size and a host with a small physical memory
size. The guest will never put any page on the inactive_clean list
because it does not have memory pressure. vmscan will never run. The
host wants to reclaim memory of the guest, but since the
inactive_clean list is empty it will find only stable pages.

--
blue skies,
 Martin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/