On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 13:00 +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On 7/23/06, Rik van Riel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > This patch implements the inactive_clean list spoken of during the VM summit.
> > > The LRU tail pages will be unmapped and ready to free, but not freeed.
> > > This gives reclaim an extra chance.
> >
> > This patch makes it possible to implement Martin Schwidefsky's
> > hypervisor-based fast page reclaiming for architectures without
> > millicode - ie. Xen, UML and all other non-s390 architectures.
>
> Hmm, I wonder how the inactive clean list helps in regard to the fast
> host reclaim
> scheme. In particular since the memory pressure that triggers the
> reclaim is in the
> host, not in the guest. So all pages might be on the active list but
> the host still
> wants to be able to discard pages.
>
I think Rik would want to set all the already unmapped pages to volatile
state in the hypervisor.
These pages can be dropped without loss of information on the guest
system since they are all already on a backing-store, be it regular
files or swap.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]