[email protected] wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:27:14 +0300, Al Boldi said:
> > Peter Williams wrote:
> > > It's probably not a good idea to have different schedulers managing
> > > the same resource. The way to do different scheduling per process is
> > > to use the scheduling policy mechanism i.e. SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR, etc.
> > > (possibly extended) within each scheduler. On the other hand, on an
> > > SMP system, having a different scheduler on each run queue (or sub set
> > > of queues) might be interesting :-).
> >
> > What's wrong with multiple run-queues on UP?
>
> On an SMP system, you can have one CPU doing one class of scheduling (long
> timeslice for computational, for example), while another CPU is dedicated
> to doing RT scheduling, and so on. It's not clear to me that "different
> classes per CPU" makes any real sense on a UP....
Conceptually there should be no difference between UP and MP.
Think HyperThreading.
Thanks!
--
Al
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
