On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 21:27:14 +0300, Al Boldi said: > Peter Williams wrote: > > It's probably not a good idea to have different schedulers managing the > > same resource. The way to do different scheduling per process is to use > > the scheduling policy mechanism i.e. SCHED_FIFO, SCHED_RR, etc. > > (possibly extended) within each scheduler. On the other hand, on an SMP > > system, having a different scheduler on each run queue (or sub set of > > queues) might be interesting :-). > > What's wrong with multiple run-queues on UP? On an SMP system, you can have one CPU doing one class of scheduling (long timeslice for computational, for example), while another CPU is dedicated to doing RT scheduling, and so on. It's not clear to me that "different classes per CPU" makes any real sense on a UP....
Attachment:
pgpB9sGrjagcQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
- References:
- Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
- From: Peter Williams <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
- From: Al Boldi <[email protected]>
- Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
- Prev by Date: Re: swsusp status report
- Next by Date: 2.6.16-stable: what's the plan?
- Previous by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
- Next by thread: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.4 for 2.6.18-rc2
- Index(es):