On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:30:23 EDT, Theodore Tso said: > both have to do a line-by-line review, and with a promise of on-disk > and ABI compatibility *forever* ---- that we do more commits in a week "forever"? Man, that's hard-core. Is that *really* the guideline, or is it some "might as well be forever in this industry" rule like "5 years"?
Attachment:
pgpIkllTEmxr6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Hans Reiser <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Steve Lord <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Nikita Danilov <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- From: Theodore Tso <[email protected]>
- the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] TIF_NOTSC and SECCOMP prctl
- Next by Date: RE: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time
- Previous by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):
 |