Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Denis Vlasenko wrote:

> I, on the contrary, want software to impose as few limits on me
> as possible.

As long as it's choosing some limit, I'll pick the one with fewer
surprises.

-- 
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
  - From: David Masover <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
  - From: "Horst H. von Brand" <[email protected]>
- Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
  - From: Denis Vlasenko <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: + spinlock_debug-dont-recompute-jiffies_per_loop.patch added to -mm tree
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] RTC: Add mmap method to rtc character driver
Previous by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
Next by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]