On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 14:43 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 08:32:55PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > > > 3) this will negate the power gain you get for tickless kernels, since
> > > > now they need to start ticking again ;( )
> > > >
> > > That is true, but only in the case where someone opens up /dev/rtc, and if they
> > > open that driver and send it a UIE or PIE ioctl, it will start ticking
> > > regardless of this patch (or that is at least my impression).
> >
> > but.. if that's X like you said.. then it's basically "always"...
> >
> Well, not always (considering the number of non-X embedded systems out there),
> but I take your point. So it really boils down to not having a tickless kernel,
> or an X server that calls gettimeofday 1 million times per second (I think thats
> the number that Dave threw out there). Unless of course, you have a third
> alternative, which, as I mentioned before I would be happy to take a crack at,
> if you would elaborate on your idea a little more.
well the idea that has been tossed about a few times is using a vsyscall
function that either calls into the kernel, or directly uses the hpet
page (which can be user mapped) to get time information that way...
or even would use rdtsc in a way the kernel knows is safe (eg corrected
for the local cpu's speed and offset etc etc).
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
