On Mon, 2006-07-24 13:37:13 -0700, Mike Benoit <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 14:06 -0400, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > The only other option at that time was to purchase Veritas backup and > its not cheap. We ended up switching to ReiserFS, it increased our > backup/restore time immensely and also bought us about 1year before the > system finally outgrew itself for good. By that time the company could > afford to drop $250,000 on high end backup software so we could grow > past 10TB. Erm, how does your data look like and why does it require a $250,000 backup solution? Sounds like I'm in the wrong business... But that's for sure not lkml related... MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [email protected] +49-172-7608481 Signature of: Don't believe in miracles: Rely on them! the second :
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] procfs: add privacy options
- Next by Date: [PATCH] [coda] Remove incorrect unlock_kernel from allocation failure path in coda_open
- Previous by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Next by thread: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
- Index(es):
 |