Re: [PATCH] Make touch_nmi_watchdog imply touch_softlockup_watchdog on all archs

* Michal Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:

> touch_nmi_watchdog() calls touch_softlockup_watchdog() on both 
> architectures that implement it (i386 and x86_64). On other 
> architectures it does nothing at all. touch_nmi_watchdog() should 
> imply touch_softlockup_watchdog() on all architectures. Suggested by 
> Andi Kleen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

although i suspect this could be cleaned up by consolidating both under 
touch_watchdog(), right?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch] IDE: Touch NMI watchdog during resume from STR
  - From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IDE: Touch NMI watchdog during resume from STR
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IDE: Touch NMI watchdog during resume from STR
  - From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] IDE: Touch NMI watchdog during resume from STR
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Make touch_nmi_watchdog imply touch_softlockup_watchdog on all archs
  - From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add maintainer for memory management
Next by Date: Re: what is necessary for directory hard links
Previous by thread: [PATCH] Make touch_nmi_watchdog imply touch_softlockup_watchdog on all archs
Next by thread: Re: [patch] IDE: Touch NMI watchdog during resume from STR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]