Re: [PATCH] Make touch_nmi_watchdog imply touch_softlockup_watchdog on all archs

* Michal Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:

> touch_nmi_watchdog() calls touch_softlockup_watchdog() on both 
> architectures that implement it (i386 and x86_64). On other 
> architectures it does nothing at all. touch_nmi_watchdog() should 
> imply touch_softlockup_watchdog() on all architectures. Suggested by 
> Andi Kleen.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

although i suspect this could be cleaned up by consolidating both under 
touch_watchdog(), right?

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch] IDE: Touch NMI watchdog during resume from STR
    • From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] IDE: Touch NMI watchdog during resume from STR
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] IDE: Touch NMI watchdog during resume from STR
    • From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch] IDE: Touch NMI watchdog during resume from STR
    • From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH] Make touch_nmi_watchdog imply touch_softlockup_watchdog on all archs
    • From: Michal Schmidt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Add maintainer for memory management
• Next by Date: Re: what is necessary for directory hard links
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] Make touch_nmi_watchdog imply touch_softlockup_watchdog on all archs
• Next by thread: Re: [patch] IDE: Touch NMI watchdog during resume from STR
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]