Andi Kleen wrote:
Michal Schmidt <[email protected]> writes:
if (stat == 0xff)
return -ENODEV;
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
+ touch_nmi_watchdog();
You can remove the touch_softlock_watchdog then. It's implied in
touch_nmi_watchdog
I don't think that's always true. There are architectures where
touch_nmi_watchdog is a NOP. This is in include/linux/nmi.h:
#ifdef ARCH_HAS_NMI_WATCHDOG
extern void touch_nmi_watchdog(void);
#else
# define touch_nmi_watchdog() do { } while(0)
#endif
Michal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
