Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Citerar Michael Buesch <[email protected]>:

> On Sunday 23 July 2006 17:49, [email protected] wrote:
> > And here comes lucky number four.
> 
> > diff --git a/include/asm-i386/types.h b/include/asm-i386/types.h
> > index 4b4b295..3cb84ac 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-i386/types.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-i386/types.h
> > @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
> >  #ifndef _I386_TYPES_H
> >  #define _I386_TYPES_H
> >  
> > +typedef _Bool bool;
> > +
> >  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> 
> I'd say that typedef must go into the !__ASSEMBLY__ section here,
> like the other typedefs in that header.

You are right. Misstook the #endif as #else (a downside of programming late).
It is corrected, thanks.

> Greetings Michael.

See ya
/Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux