Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4)

On Sunday 23 July 2006 17:49, [email protected] wrote:
> And here comes lucky number four.

> diff --git a/include/asm-i386/types.h b/include/asm-i386/types.h
> index 4b4b295..3cb84ac 100644
> --- a/include/asm-i386/types.h
> +++ b/include/asm-i386/types.h
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>  #ifndef _I386_TYPES_H
>  #define _I386_TYPES_H
>  
> +typedef _Bool bool;
> +
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__

I'd say that typedef must go into the !__ASSEMBLY__ section here,
like the other typedefs in that header.

-- 
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4)
    • From: [email protected]

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
    • From: [email protected]
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4)
    • From: [email protected]

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 3/3] [-rt] Fixes the timeout-bug in the rtmutex/PI-futex.
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4)
• Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4)
• Next by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean (version 4)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]