On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 16:30:53 +0200 Ondrej Zary <[email protected]> wrote: > > cat /proc/apm produces oops on my DTK notebook. Using "apm=broken-psr" kernel > parameter fixes that but I lose the battery info. I'd like to have the > battery info (and it works fine in Windows) so I want to debug it and > (hopefully) fix. Is there some reason you can't (or don't want to) use ACPI on this machine? > The oops: > # cat /proc/apm > <1>BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00005e88 ^^^^ Looks like it tried to access through the stack pointer while executeing 16 bit code. > printing eip: > 00002f9d > *pre = 00000000 > Oops: 0002 [#4] > Modules linked in: > CPU: 0 > EIP: 00c0:[<00002f9d>] Not tainted VLI ^^^^ This is the APM BIOS 16 bit code segment. > EFLAGS: 00010017 (2.6.17-5-dtk #23) > EIP is at 0x2f94 > eax: 00000033 ebx: 00000001 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000000 > esi: c10a1000 edi: 00000014 ebp: c4755e8a esp: c4755e88 ^^^^ Accessing the stack while executing 16 bit code is never going to work. > ds: 00c8 es: 0000 ss: 0068 > Process cat (pid: 1928, threadinfo=c4754000 task=c11240b0) > Stack: 5e948001 5fc75e55 00005e94 000000c8 10000033 5ea800c0 00000001 530a0000 > 00000016 00b86017 00000000 0000530a c010830f 00000060 0000530a 00000033 > 0000007b 0000007b c0337368 00000000 c10a1000 00000000 00000000 00000282 > Call Trace: > <c010830f> apm_bios_call+0x68/0xba <c0108728> apm_get_power_status+0x44/0x90 > <c01091a0> apm_get_info+0x34/0xdc <c01617dc> proc_file_read+0xda/0x22d > <c013b5a2> vfs_read+0x82/0x10e <c013b873> sys_read+0x3c/0x62 > <c0102397> syscall_call+0x7/0xb > Code: Bad EIP value. > EIP: [<00002f9d>] 0x2f9d SS:ESP 0068:c4755e88 > > So it looks like it dies somewhere in the APM BIOS code. But how to find > exactly where and/or why? Maybe use GDB somehow (I've used it only for really > simple debugging yet). > I've tried calling the APM 0x530A function from DOS (real mode, int 15h) and > single-stepping the BIOS APM code (using good old user-friendly Turbo > Debugger). Noticed some OUTs to 0xB1 (or something like that), then some PCI > accesses (0xCF8 and 0xCFC) and then IP ended in area of all zeros. When I > step over the int 15h call, it works fine - returns correct info. APM BIOS's are often only tested in real mode as that will suffice for older Windows systems. If you machine is less than 6 years old, Windows is almost certainly using ACPI and not APM. If you really want this fixedm you will have to talk to your machine menufacturer (or the BIOS manufacturer). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [email protected] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpMgjDg1Xd0m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debugging APM - cat /proc/apm produces oops
- From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
- Re: Debugging APM - cat /proc/apm produces oops
- From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
- Re: Debugging APM - cat /proc/apm produces oops
- From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
- Re: Debugging APM - cat /proc/apm produces oops
- References:
- Debugging APM - cat /proc/apm produces oops
- From: Ondrej Zary <[email protected]>
- Debugging APM - cat /proc/apm produces oops
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 3/3] [-rt] Fixes the timeout-bug in the rtmutex/PI-futex.
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset to k(z|c)alloc.
- Previous by thread: Re: Debugging APM - cat /proc/apm produces oops
- Next by thread: Re: Debugging APM - cat /proc/apm produces oops
- Index(es):