Re: [PATCH] drivers: Conversions from kmalloc+memset tok(z|c)alloc.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Panagiotis Issaris wrote:
> Ah okay. Up until now, I thought it would be okay to change the style of
> the code if it was listed in the CodingStyle document and in any other
> cause should be left untouched as it would be left to the maintainers
> personal preference. That's why I explicitly asked about the "if ((buf =
> kmalloc(...)==NULL) -> buf = kmalloc(...); if (!buf)" type of changes.
> 
> Ofcourse, I should have put cosmetic changes in a separate patch anyway.

At least Andrew seems to prefer cleaning up in the same patch. Anyway, I 
don't think Jeff meant that you shouldn't do any cleanups, but that you 
should try to respect the existing style as much possible. There are 
things that are almost generally agreed upon, such as removal of redundant 
typecasts, redundant wrappers, and moving assignment out of if statement 
expression. Formatting and the dreaded sizeof thing, however, 
are not, so it is best to keep them as-is.

				Pekka
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux