On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:17:38 EDT, Dmitry Torokhov said: > Another question for you - what is the best way to describe > dependancy of a sub-option on a subsystem so you won't end up with the > subsystem as a module and user built in. Something like > > config IBM_ASM > tristate "Device driver for IBM RSA service processor" > depends on X86 && PCI && EXPERIMENTAL > ... > config IBM_ASM_INPUT > bool "Support for remote keyboard/mouse" > depends on IBM_ASM && (INPUT=y || INPUT=IMB_ASM) > > But the above feels yucky. Could we have something like: > > depends on matching(INPUT, IBM_ASM) What feels yucky is the dependency of a 'bool' on a tristate. Does the ASM_INPUT get used in places where the source file can only be a builtin, not a module?
Attachment:
pgpb8GPBtYYRd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- References:
- Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- From: Roman Zippel <[email protected]>
- Re: Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <[email protected]>
- Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH] A generic boolean
- Next by Date: Re: Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- Next by thread: Re: Fwd: Using select in boolean dependents of a tristate symbol
- Index(es):
 |