Re: [patch 12/45] 2 oopses in ethtool

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:26:45AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> The function pointers which were checked were for their get_* counterparts.
> Typically a copy-paste typo.

Yes, I'm sure that was a copy and pasto when I originally did it ;-)
Thanks, I endorse this patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [patch 12/45] 2 oopses in ethtool
  - From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Reiser4 Inclusion
Next by Date: Re: bttv-driver.c:3964: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
Previous by thread: [patch 12/45] 2 oopses in ethtool
Next by thread: [patch 09/45] pnp: suppress request_irq() warning
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]