Re: [patch 12/45] 2 oopses in ethtool

On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 09:26:45AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> The function pointers which were checked were for their get_* counterparts.
> Typically a copy-paste typo.

Yes, I'm sure that was a copy and pasto when I originally did it ;-)
Thanks, I endorse this patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [patch 12/45] 2 oopses in ethtool
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Reiser4 Inclusion
• Next by Date: Re: bttv-driver.c:3964: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be
• Previous by thread: [patch 12/45] 2 oopses in ethtool
• Next by thread: [patch 09/45] pnp: suppress request_irq() warning
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]