Christian Trefzer schrieb am 2006-07-16:
> fsck on a faulty drive might cause even more damage - how do you know
> that other areas of the device are OK?
All drives I bought in the recent years shipped with ARRE and ARWE set.
Any halfway decent fsck tool can just rewrite the b0rked sector and the
drive transparently remaps a spare.
If reiser4 crashes the kernel instead, it's not failure resilient and is
certainly not ready for production.
> I also oppose the ReiserFS-v3.x design philosophy regarding faulty
> storage layer, but in any case where your _live_ data is valuable and
> uptime counts, you _really_should_ use a RAID of some sort.
...and certainly a backup system that gives you FAST access to the data.
RAID doesn't protect against accidents with rm(1) or, worse, wipe(1).
--
Matthias Andree
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]