>
>Using this as an argument against plug-ins is a bit strange. I suppose
>somebody could go overboard and use plug-ins to implement a subKernel.
>Would this then imply that plug-ins are wrong?
>
Ok, I've read some other threads too and so this claim should be adjusted:
Writing a plugin (not necessarily r4 specific) that changes the semantics
of objects based on context (i.e. turning a file into a dir) is a bad idea
IMHO.
Actually, BSD has this double-semantic to a limited degree: you can call
`/usr/bin/vi /usr/bin` and get some binary representation of readdir.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]