What is the motivation behind killing the sys_sysctl call anyway? Sure its more ugly esthetically but it works. Is it because of the desire to virtualize all namespaces? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
- References:
- [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
- Prev by Date: [RFC][PATCH 08/27] increment sb writer count when nlink hits zero
- Next by Date: [RFC][PATCH 09/27] elevate writer count for chown and friends
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
- Index(es):
 |