Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl

> So it will correctly handle that sysctl being compiled out, and
> the fallback to using /proc.  The code seems to have been
> doing that since it was added to glibc in 2000.

Using /proc is extremly slow for this. You added significant 
cost to each program startup.

I still think it's a good idea to simulate that sysctl and printk
the others.
 
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

References:
- [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
  - From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] SCSI disk won't spinup, so boot hangs
Next by Date: Re: [discuss] Re: [PATCH] Allow all Opteron processors to change pstate at same time
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Allow /proc/sys without sys_sysctl
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]