On 12/07/06, Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote:
On 12/07/06, Catalin Marinas <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/07/06, Michal Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Here is a slabinfo from current 2.6.18-rc1-git4 and 2.6.18-rc1 +
> > kmemleak http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/o_bugs/kml/slab.txt
>
> Thanks. Does it make any difference if you enable
> CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMLEAK_TASK_STACKS? Also, if you save the memleak file
> periodically, do any of the context_struct_to_string reports disappear
> (I can investigate this if you upload a few ml60.txt, mk61.txt etc.)?
Here are the results
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/o_bugs/kml/ml/
The context_struct_to_string leaks do not seem to disappear in
subsequent ml?.txt files which makes me think it's a real leak.
Thanks for collecting these statistics.
--
Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
