Re: resource_size_t and printk()

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:18:09 +0200 Pierre Ossman wrote:

> Greg KH wrote:
> > Good catch, care to create a patch to fix these?
> >   
> 
> Included.

ugh :(

I know it's more wordy, but we usually use
(unsigned long long), not just (long long).

Wish we had an abbreviation for that.

---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: resource_size_t and printk()
    • From: Kyle McMartin <[email protected]>

• References:
  • resource_size_t and printk()
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: resource_size_t and printk()
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: resource_size_t and printk()
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>
  • Re: resource_size_t and printk()
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: resource_size_t and printk()
    • From: Pierre Ossman <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [patch] s390: Fix sparse warnings.
• Next by Date: Re: please revert kthread from loop.c
• Previous by thread: Re: resource_size_t and printk()
• Next by thread: Re: resource_size_t and printk()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]