Re: resource_size_t and printk()

[Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>]

Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 10:54:54PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
>   
>> Hi there!
>>
>> Your commit b60ba8343b78b182c03cf239d4342785376c1ad1 has been causing me
>> a bit of confusion and I thought I'd point out the problem so that you
>> can resolve it. :)
>>
>> resource_size_t is not guaranteed to be a long long, but might be a u64
>> or u32 depending on your .config. So you need an explicit cast in the
>> printk:s or you get a lot of junk on the output.
>>     
>
> That is exactly correct.  Is there somewhere in that patch that I forgot
> to fix this up properly?
>
>   

In drivers/pnp/interface.c, theres a couple of these:

@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static ssize_t pnp_show_current_resource
 			if (pnp_port_flags(dev, i) & IORESOURCE_DISABLED)
 				pnp_printf(buffer," disabled\n");
 			else
-				pnp_printf(buffer," 0x%lx-0x%lx\n",
+				pnp_printf(buffer," 0x%llx-0x%llx\n",
 						pnp_port_start(dev, i),
 						pnp_port_end(dev, i));
 		}


Rgds
Pierre

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/